Penality Order of Complaint No. 501 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No.501/2025/TG RERA (Penalty Order)
Dated: 25th March 2026
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Katchala Nanaji, S/o Appalanaidu
(Flat 401, Gamma Building, IIT Bhilai, Durg, Chattisgarh-491002)
…Complainant
Versus
M/s Srinandhan Infra Developers Private Limited,
Rep by its Managing Director, .T. Vijayalakshmi, w/o T. Ganesh,
(Unit D, 4th Floor, Spaces & More Business Park Kavuri Hills, Phase-1,
Guttala Begumpet, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana, India - 500033.)
…Respondent
The above-numbered Complaint No. 501 of 2025 was filed by the Complainant before the
Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter referred to as “the Authority”) against
the Respondent in respect of the project styled as “Supreme City”, situated at Polepally. Upon
adjudication of the said complaint, this Authority, after examining the pleadings, documents,
and material placed on record, has passed orders dated: 31.01.2026 in Complaint No. 501 of
2025 holding that the Respondent had advertised, marketed and sold plots in the said project
without obtaining mandatory registration, thereby violating the provisions of Sections 3 and 4
of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the
RE(R&D) Act, 2016”).
2. The findings of the Authority vide orders dated 31.01.2026 in Complaint No. 501 of 2025
are as follows:
Upon careful perusal of the documents placed on record by the
Complainant, it is observed that the Respondent promoted a real estate project
under the name and style of “Supreme City”, described as a DTCP proposed
layout, situated at Polepally SEZ, and proceeded to market and sell plots in the
said project.
It is further evident from the material available on record that the
Respondents undertook the promotion and sale of plots in the subject project
without obtaining registration under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation
Page 1 of 5

---

Page 2 of 5

---

---

trade

practice,

deliberate

misrepresentation,

and

regulatory

malpractice, which aggravates the violations already established under the
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Compounding the above, the Respondent has exhibited persistent
recalcitrance and disregard for this Authority’s directions. Despite due service
of notices and repeated opportunities, the Respondent has failed to appear, file
replies, or offer any explanation. Such conduct demonstrates wilful evasion of
regulatory scrutiny and undermines the efficacy and integrity of the regulatory
mechanism established under the RE(R&D) Act 2016.
In view of the repeated, grave, and wilful violations recorded hereinabove,
and in exercise of the powers conferred upon this Authority under Sections 37
and 38 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, this
Authority is satisfied that preventive and prohibitory directions are necessary
in the larger public interest to ensure compliance with the RE(R&D) Act and
to protect prospective allottees from further prejudice.
Accordingly, until the Respondent demonstrates full compliance with the
provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, to the
satisfaction of this Authority, the Respondent, i.e., M/s. Srinandhan Infra
Page 4 of 5

---

Sd/Sri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Sri. Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA
Page 5 of 5

---