Order Complaint No.168 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No. 168 of 2025
Dated: 14th of August, 2025
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Smt. Vaddi Naga Jaya Lakshmi
W/o. Vaddi Vankatramana
3-4-106/1-105, May Flower Park,
Mallapur, kapra, Hyderabad,
Rangareddy, Telangana - 500076
…Complainant
Versus
1. M/s Vajra Prekon Estates, Represented by its Managing Partners
Sri. V.V. Durga Prasad, and Sri. K. Prem Chand,
Flat No. 303, Sai Krishna Villa, D.No. 2-22-2/33 & 34,
Plot No. 33 & 34, AS Raju Nagar,
Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri, Telangana – 500072
2. M/s First Man Group Property Floor, Represented by its Managing Director
Sri. Anil Kumar Pattapu,
1st Floor, MRLS Hub, No. 45, Jai Hind Gandhi Rd,
Ayyappa Society, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500081
…Respondents
The present matter filed by the Complainant mentioned herein above came up for
hearing on 25.06.2025 before this Authority in the presence of Counsel for Complainant, M/s.
Dejure Chambers and the representative of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, and upon hearing the
submissions of both the parties, this Authority proceeds to pass the following ORDER:
2.

This Complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and

Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the
Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as
the “Rules”) seeking appropriate action against the Respondent.
1

---

In the complaint, the Complainant sought a direction to the Respondent to comply with

the terms of the Agreement of Sale dated 19.02.2025 by registering the open Plot bearing No.
234, admeasuring 165 Sq. Yards, situated in the layout named “Balaji Gardens” (MITHILA ECITY), Ameerpet, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In the alternative, the
Complainant had prayed for refund of ₹30,52,500/- along with interest at 18% per annum.
4.

On 25.06.2025, the Complainant submitted a memo stating that subsequent to the filing

of the complaint, the Respondent took corrective action and proceeded to register the subject
plot in favor of the Complainant, vide Challan No. 194GTV170625 before S.R.O.
Maheshwaram. She also stated that the said registration took place only due to the intervention
of this Authority and would not have occurred otherwise.
5.

The Complainant, through the said memo, has also submitted that the delay and

negligence on the part of the Respondent caused unwarranted mental stress, anxiety, and
financial burden, and has accordingly sought compensation of ₹5,00,000/- towards legal
expenses and mental agony.
6.

Upon perusal of the original complaint and reliefs sought therein, this Authority

observes that no such prayer for compensation or legal expenses was made in the complaint at
the time of filing. Reliefs that are not originally pleaded in the complaint cannot be granted
subsequently through a memo or oral submission. Accordingly, this prayer cannot be
entertained.
7.

As the main relief sought in the complaint has been met, the present complaint stands

disposed of. No further claims or contentions subsist between the parties, and the matter is
accordingly closed.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Sri. Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS(Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA

2

---