Order Complaint No.1634 OF 2023

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
21stDay of March 2025
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
COMPLAINT NO.1634 OF 2023

1. Prameela Potu
2. Suman Dakshinamurthy Pillai
3. Farzana Shaik
4. Satyendra Paalapudi
5. Ashok Barla
6. A. Praveen Kumar
7. P. Srinivas Rao
8. Tarun Krishna Gannaboina
9. Rallabandi Suresh Kumar

…Complainants
Versus

1. M/s Bhel NAGNAR Mutually aided Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
2. M/s One Developers Pvt. Ltd.
3. M/s Naandi Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
Represented through its Authorised Representatives

…Respondents

The present matter filed by the Complainants herein came up for
hearing on 14.02.2025 before this Authority in the presence of Counsel for
Complainants, Sri Harinath Reddy, Counsel for Respondent No.1, Sri Nayini
Rajeshwar Rao& Ms. Sravya Katta, Counsel for Respondent No.2, Sri M. V.
Pratap and Counsel for Respondent No.3, Sri Siva Kumar and after hearing
the arguments, this Authority passes the following ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainants under

Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016

1 of 2

(hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred
to as the “Rules”) seeking appropriate relief(s)against the Respondent.
3.

The Complainants filed respective letters seeking withdrawal of the

respective Complaint filed by them, on the ground thatthe Respondent No.1
Societyconducted its general body meeting and majority of members have
attended the meeting in which the Society approved the audit of the society
and agreed and decided to make immediate payments to the contractor
appointed by the Society on 26.05.2024 and the Respondent No.3 Builder
also agreed to complete the works at the earliest point of time.That as the
disputes between the parties have been amicably resolved, they sought to
withdraw theabove-mentioned complaints.
4.

It had come to the knowledge of this Authority that the project in

question is titled “BHEL Nagnar Villas” has admittedly not been registered in
accordance with Sections 3 & 4 of the Act, 2016. Therefore, this Authority
has taken suo motocognizance of the said violations and appropriate action
has been initiated against the Respondents in line with Sections 59 & 60 of
the Act, 2016.

5.

In light of the observations made in Para No.3 above, the present

complaints are disposed of as withdrawn.

SdSri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

SdSri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd-

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TG RERA

2 of 2