Order Details
| Order Type | TG-RERA Authority |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | Complaint No.120 of 2024 |
| Year | 2024 |
| Order Category | Regular Order |
| Order Date | 27 Aug 2024 |
| Complainant | Sri Avasarala Srinivas |
| Respondent | Represented through its Partner |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_280924183939892.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
COMPLAINT NO.120 OF 2024
27th Day of August 2024
Corum:
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
Sri Avasarala Srinivas
…Complainant
Versus
M/s Bhumija Developers
Represented through its Partner
…Respondent
The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on
27.08.2024 before this Authority and none appeared for Complainant or the
Respondent and, this Authority passes the following ORDER:
2.
The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31
of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 read with Rule (hereinafter
referred to as the “Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation
and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) seeking
appropriate relief against the Respondent.
3.
Complainant and the Respondent were called for hearing on 27.08.2024
wherein both parties failed to appear. This Authority observes that the complaint is
made in one single line stating, “paint worn out within one year”. And the relief prayed
for is “Painting inside the flat is worn out very badly. Please repaint”. No document to
establish such allegation is filed along with the Complaint except the sale deed
1 of 2
bearing document No.7829/2021 dated 23.04.2021 executed in favour of the
Complainant and the Occupancy Certificate of the Project bearing Proceeding
No.051798/GHT/OC/U6/HMDA/20012022
dated
21.04.2022
issued
by
the
competent authority. In such circumstances, when adequate information is not filed
in support of the allegation made by the Complainant, this Authority is of the
considered view that no action can be taken against the Respondent.
4.
This Authority is also of the considered opinion that an opportunity was
afforded to the Complainant to appear and submit before this Authority. Given the
Complainant's absence without any notice or reasonable cause, it is apparent that
the Complainant does not seek to pursue the matter. In lieu thereof, the present
Complaint stands dismissed for non-prosecution as well as for non-filing of adequate
information.
5.
If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal within 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order.
Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA
Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA
Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TS RERA
2 of 2
Related Orders
Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place