Order Complaint No. 97 of 2024

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
11th September 2024
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
COMPLAINT NO.97 OF 2024

K Venkateshwara Rao
(Y Kiran
Deepak Cherukuri
M.Anil
(R/so H.no. 3-6-643, fat no.202, Shreya Elegance Apartment, Street no. 9,
Himayatnagar, Hyderabad – 500029)

…Complainant
Versus
M/s Suvarnaavani Estate (India)Pvt Ltd
(Rep by Managing Dircetor Surender Kumar R/o Plot no. 44, 2nf floor, Banjara Green Colony, Banjara
Hills Road no.12, Hyderabad - 500034)

…Respondents
The present Complaint came up for hearing before this Authority on 11.09.2024.
However, none appeared on behalf of either party despite due service of notice to the
complainants and multiple opportunities extended by the Authority.
2.

Initially, the Complainants appeared before this Authority on 30.07.2024 at the stage of

admission of the Complaint. At that time, it was recorded that the notices sent to the
Respondent were returned with the postal endorsement "Addressee Left". Accordingly, the
Complainants were directed to personally serve notice to the Respondent, and the matter was
adjourned to 20.08.2024.
3.

On 20.08.2024, once again, none appeared on behalf of either party. Upon perusal of the

records, it was brought to the notice of the Authority that the Complainants had not collected
the notices from the registry in order to serve them upon the Respondent, as previously
directed. Therefore, the Authority directed issuance of fresh notices to both parties and
adjourned the matter to 11.09.2024.
1 of 2

4.

On 11.09.2024, the Complainants failed to appear before this Authority and did not take

any steps to pursue their Complaint. Further, they did not collect the notices from the registry,
nor did they make any effort to effect service on the Respondent.
5.

In view of the consistent non-appearance of the Complainants and their failure to

comply with directions of this Authority, it appears that the Complainants are no longer
interested in prosecuting the Complaint.
6.

Hence, this Complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.

SdSri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

SdSri. Laxmi NaryanaJannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

SdDr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA

2 of 2