Order Complaint No. 96 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No. 96 of 2025
23rd October 2025
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

M/s. Aparna Constructions & Estates Pvt. Ltd
Office # 802, Astral Heights, D. No. 6-3-3S2/2&3,
Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034,
Rep by its authorized signatory
G. Raghunath Reddy S/o. Late G. Sreenivasula Reddy,
aged about 50 years, R/o. #802, Astral Heights,
6-3-352/2 & 3, Road No 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034

… Complainant
Versus
1. Guthula Bhavani
W/o. Sri. Guthula Sriram, Aged about 33 years,
Occ: Housewife, R/o. Flat No. 205, Block - K,
Aparna Serenity, Sy. No. 25/1, Petbasheerabad Village,
Quthbullapur Mandal,Medchal-Malkajgiri District - 500100

2. Guthula Sri Ram
S/o. Balaram Murthy, Aged about 46 years,
Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No. 205, Block - K,
Aparna Serenity, Sy. No. 25/1, Petbasheerabad Village,
Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District - 500100

… Respondents

The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31 of the Real
Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “RE (R&D) Act”)
read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017
(hereinafter referred to as the “TG RE (R&D) Rules”) seeking appropriate relief(s) against the
Respondents.
2.

On 14.10.2025, Both the parties submitted the Joint Compromise Memo Filed by the

Complainant and Respondents dated 14.10.2025 requesting permission to withdraw the
complaint. It was stated therein that the Respondents are undertaken alterations/constructions
to external wall of the Flat No. 205 in violation of the Sanctioned Plan, terms and conditions
1

---

Subsequently, the Complainant and the Respondents have amicably settled the dispute

out of court in respect of Flat No. 205 in the project titled “Aparna Serenity,” more particularly
described in the Schedule annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the “Schedule Property”),
in accordance with the terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by the parties, as set forth
in the Joint Compromise Memo filed by the Complainant and the Respondents.
4.

In view of the said Joint Compromise Memo Filed by the Complainant and Respondents

and considering the voluntary and mutual nature of the request, this Authority permits the
withdrawal of the complaint.
5.

Accordingly, the present Complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

No order as to costs.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TG RERA

2

---