TG-RERA Authority

Order Complaint No. 689 of 2021

26 Oct 2023
TG-RERA Authority
1 Pages

Order Details

Order Type TG-RERA Authority
Complaint/Case Number Complaint No. 689 of 2021
Year 2021
Order Category Regular Order
Order Date 26 Oct 2023
Complainant Sri B Madhavi
Respondent 3. Sri Anjaiah
PDF Document Download PDF BU_231123191401263.pdf

Full Order Text

BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
COMPLAINT NO.689 OF 2021
26th Day of October, 2023
Corum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Sri B Madhavi

…Complainant
Versus

1. Sri Venkateswara Constructions
2. Sri Dontham Srinivas Reddy
3. Sri Anjaiah

…Respondents

The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on
09.08.2023, 12.09.2023 and 10.10.2023 before this Authority in the presence of
Sri Sri B Anil Reddy, Son of Complainant along with his Brother Sri Santosh
Reddy, on behalf of the Complainant, Sri Rajaram, son of Respondent No.3 on
behalf of Respondent No.3, and none for Respondent No.1 & 2 appeared and upon
hearing the arguments of both the parties, this Authority passes the following
ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate

(Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) read
with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules,
2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) requesting to take appropriate action
against the Respondent Builder.

A. Brief facts of the case:

1 of 6

3.

The Complainant, purchased a Flat No.105 on 15.08.2019 in the project

“Smarun Sarovar Apartment” registered with this Authority vide Seventy-Twon No.
P02500001195, situated at Mansoorabad, Near Sahara Estates, LB Nagar,
Hyderabad for a total sale consideration of Rs.72,50,000/- (Rupees Seventy Two
Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) from the Respondent No.1 Builder/Developer
represented by its partners, Late D. Venugopal Reddy and Late Smt. Kavitha and
Sri Anjaiah, Land Owner and duly entered into Agreement of Sale vide Document
No.18339 dated 05.08.2019. He provided details of the payment made to the
Respondent No.1 Builder as follows:
S.No. Date

Payment Mode

Amount (Rs.)

1.

15.08.2029

Cash

9,99,000

2.

12.09.2019

Cash

3,00,000

3.

26.09.2019

Cash

4,95,000

4.

09.10.2019

Cash

2,90,000

5.

24.10.2019

Cash

2,70,000

6.

28.10.2019

Cash

3,60,000

7.

27.11.2019

Cash

5,45,000

8.

28.11.2019

Cash

2,00,000

9.

28.12.2019

Cash

4,39,000

10.

13.08.2020

Cash

6,76,000

11.

01.03.2021

Cash

60,000

12.

04.03.2021

Cash

3,00,000

13.

03.03.2020

Cheque

5,00,000

No.937762
14.

05.03.2021

Cheque

3,40,000

No.590217
15.

06.07.2021

Cheque

3,50,000

No.690233

2 of 6

Total:

4.

61,24,000

He

submitted

that

the

Respondent

Builder

i.e.,

Sri

Venkateswara

Constructions failed to complete the pending works in the apartment, and that the
Complainant had personally spent approximately Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two
Lakhs Only) towards Flooring, Cupboards, Wall tiles etc. Subsequently, before
registration the managing partners of the Respondent Builder Company passed
away in an accident.

5.

That on 06.09.2021, Sri Rajaram, Land Owner has visited the Complainant's

apartment and have got issued legal notices to Flat Nos. 102, 103 and 105 stating
that he did not receive any amount from the Flat owners. However, the
Complainant had paid the total sale consideration to the Respondent Builder who
has unfortunately died.

6.

In lieu thereof, he requested this Authority to direct the landowner, Sri

Anjaiah to register the flat in the Complainant’s name. However, the Complainant’s
son, Sri Anil Reddy appeared on 09.08.2023 and submitted that the landowner has
already registered the flat in his mother’s name on 08.09.2022vide Document
No.4860/2022 before SRO, Saroornagar.

B. Relief sought:
7.

He accordingly prayed that the works in the flat were still incomplete and

submitted photos to establish his case. He further submitted that since he paid an
amount of Rs.61,24,000/- (Rupees Sixty One Lakhs Twenty Four Thousand Only)
to the Managing Partners of the Respondent Builder Company and they passed

3 of 6

away, he sought refund of the same from the legal heirs of the said managing
partners.

C. Reply on behalf of the Respondents:
8.

This Authority issued Notices dated 04.09.2023 and 12.09.2023 to all the

Respondents in the Complaint along with the Complainants to appear before this
Authority for hearing. Notices issued to the Respondent No.1 – Sri Venkateshwara
Constructions was returned on 25.09.2023 with the note “left” and the Notice to
Respondent No.2 – Sri Dontham Sreenivas Reddy was also returned on 27.09.2023
with the note “refused”. The Notice on Sri Anjaiah – Landowner, Respondent No.3 is
complete and he appeared before this Authority through his son, Sri Raja Ram.

9.

Per contra, on 10.10.2023, Sri Raja Ram, son of Landowner Sri Anjaiah

submitted that the flat has already been registered in favor of the Complainant and
that the flat belongs to the share of the Landowner and not the Developer’s share
and that the registration has been done on 08.09.2022. He filed an Encumbrance
Certificate obtained online showing encumbrance of the Complainant’s name on
the said flat and also submitted a Memorandum of Understanding dated
08.09.2022 signed by the Complainant and Sri K. Raja Ram wherein following is
agreed:

(a) Sri K. Raja Ram shall register the flat in the name of the Complainant.
(b) The Complainant agreed to pay an amount of Rs.41,50,000/- (Rupees FortyOne Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only).
(c) The Complainant agreed to transfer Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five
Lakhs Only) through RTGS and remaining Rs.16,50,000/- (Rupees Sixteen

4 of 6

Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) vide Cheque No.258737 dated 07.09.2022
drawn on Canara Bank, Hyderabad.
(d) Sri K. Raja Ram shall withdraw criminal complaint lodged against the
Complainant and O.S. No.1006/2021 pending before Ranga Reddy District
Courts.
(e) The Complainant shall withdraw O.S. No.1478/2021 pending before Ranga
Reddy District Courts.
(f) That the Complainant shall co-operate for getting the NOC for the building
from the concerned authorities within 30 days from the date of MOU.

10.

Accordingly, this Memorandum of Understanding was signed by both parties

and subsequently, another Affidavit was signed by the Complainant, Smt. B.
Madhavi categorically stating as under:

“that after the death of Mr. D. Venugopal, I got registered the aforesaid property in
my name and my son’s name and the Sale Deed is executed by Sri K. Raja Ram.

That I hereby declare and state that the above mentioned original Agreement of Sale
dated 15.08.2019 was misplaced, if it is traced in future date then I will handover
the same to Sri K. Rajaram and not going to raise any issues regarding that
Agreement of Sale and pertaining to this property, if any issues arise by myself or by
my heirs then any legal actions can be taken against me.”

D. Observations and Directions of the Authority:
11.

That the parties appeared for hearing on 10.10.2023. the Complainant

requested this Authority to call the legal heirs of the Respondent No.1 Builder i.e.,
son and daughter of Late Sri D. Venugopal Reddy and Late Smt. Kavitha and also

5 of 6

the parents of Late Sri D. Venugopal Reddy who is arrayed as Respondent No.2 i.e.,
Sri Dontham Srinivas Reddy in the present matter. As noted above, the notice of
hearing was refused by him as per the postal acknowledgment, and the son and
the daughter have not been arrayed as parties in the present complaint.

12.

Admittedly, the Complainant has got the flat registered in its name and she

is in occupation. Further, after signing of the above affidavit produced by the
landowner, Sri Raja Ram, no claim remains. The Complainant is at liberty to
approach other forums for such other reliefs, which are not subject matter
jurisdiction before this Authority. Hence the matter is disposed of on the above
terms.

13.

If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate

Appellate Tribunal (vide G.O.Ms.No.8, Dt.11-01-2018, the Telangana State Value
Added Tax Appellate Tribunal has been designated as TS Real Estate Appellate
Tribunal to manage the affairs under the Act till the regular Tribunal is established)
within 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
TS RERA

Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
TS RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, Hon’ble Chairperson
TS RERA

6 of 6

Related Orders

Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)
15 Apr 2026
Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.
09 Apr 2026
Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.
08 Apr 2026
Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.
08 Apr 2026
Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.
08 Apr 2026

Need Complete Property Verification?

Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place

Ownership Details
EC Records
Survey Sketch
Zone Checks
Geo-Insights
AI Analysis
Try VerifyMyLand Now ✨ Get comprehensive property verification in minutes

Verify Your Property Before You Buy

AI-powered legal due diligence — title verification, encumbrance checks, zoning compliance, and risk assessment in minutes. Catch issues before they cost you crores.