Order Complaint No. 658 of 2022

BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
COMPLAINT NO.658 OF 2022
6th Day of November, 2023
Corum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Ranganadha Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association

…Complainant

Versus
Sri Daggubati Suresh Babu & 8 Ors.

…Respondent

The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on
26.09.2023 & 01.11.2023 before this Authority in the presence of the Counsel for
the Respondents and none for the Complainant Association and upon hearing the
arguments, this Authority passes the following ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate

(Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) read
with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules,
2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) requesting appropriate action against
the Respondent Builder.
A. Brief facts on behalf of the Complainant:
3.

The Complainant submits that during the years 1985 to 1990, Sri PR

Chowdhary and Sri NV Ramanaiah by taking GPA from certain farmers in respect
of the land in Sy.Nos. 163, 165, 166, 167, 169, 171, 172, 269, 270, 275, 276, 277,
278, 279, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286 situated at Gopanpally Village, Serlingampally
Mandal, Ranga Reddy District have carried out laying the land and sold plots
admeasuring 200 Sq Yds, 300 Sq Yds and 500 Sq Yds under due registration.

1 of 4

4.

In the year 2005, land was pooled and acquired for construction of IT parks

and allied organisations and accordingly a gazette notification and declaration was
published based on the documents available with the concerned Sub-Registrar but
not basing on the documents available at concerned MRO. As a result, notices were
issued to certain parties who don't even have rights and title over the subject land
and the said persons have approached High Court challenging the gazette
notification. The said case was dismissed by the then Hon'ble High Court of united
Andhra Pradesh in the year 2005 directing the Revenue Authorities to decide on
the matter.
5.

However, the Revenue Authorities didn't take up and decide the matter

despite Court orders. Further, some land grabbers in collusion with the Municipal
Authorities have dispossessed the Complainants and have demolished all the
rooms and sheds existing in the subject property with a view to mala fidely
establish that the said land grabbers are the owners and possessors of the subject
property.
6.

That the Revenue and Municipal Authorities are trying to benefit certain

individuals viz., Daggubati Suresh Babu (Head of M/s Suresh Productions) and his
family members, Solipuram Ranjith Reddy, Head of M/s Lumbini Constructions
(Son-in-law of Hon'ble Minister of Endowments Sri Indrakaran Reddy), Nadimpally
Venkata Ramaraju Alias Jalavihar Ramaraju, Nadendla venkataratnam (Ex-Chief
Minister's brother's Son) and many others. That these individuals are misleading
the authorities and courts. When the applicants approached local Police Station
(Gachibowli PS) and Cyberabad CP Sri Stephen Ravindra, they have advised the
applicants to approach Court if they claim rights and title over the subject property
and are supporting the land grabbers.
7.

In this regard, the Complainants have requested this Authority to take up

this matter on Suo-motu basis duly enquiring into the ownership and title of the
applicants on the subject property and to direct the Revenue, Municipal and HMDA
authorities to take action accordingly.
B. Reply on behalf of the Respondents:

2 of 4

8.

That the Respondents were issued notices to file reply and accordingly, vide

Reply dated 21.01.2023, the Daggubati Farms and Estates Private Limited
submitted a reply stating that complainants have no right to approach the TSRERA
as there is absolutely no construction or application for any permission for building
or for any other development in the mentioned lands. They added that RERA has
absolutely no jurisdiction in the said matter and that the Complainants have
completely suppressed the facts pertaining to the ongoing suits and litigations that
have been decided against them and have maliciously approached this forum in a
desperate manner.
C. Rejoinder by the Complainant:
9.

Complainant Association, vide Rejoinder dated 25.04.2023 submitted that

submitted the Respondents, while ignoring the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court and ignoring that the still matter is sub-judice some of the illegal
encroachers have erected temporary constructions illegally in spite of there being
specific orders a Writ petition was also filed some of the illegal encroachers even
made application to the GHMC authorities for construction of structures on the
land initiated for acquisition when no permission is sanctioned filed Writ Petition
suppressing fact that the matter is sub-judice filed Writ Petitions seeking
permission for dispose of representations and the GHMC authorities are rightly
issuing notice for demolishing the temporary constructions on the subject lands.
D. Observations and Directions of the Authority:
10.

That the matter was called for hearing and the notice to the complainant

association was returned twice with the note “insufficient address”. The Counsel for
Respondents appeared and reiterated the contents of its reply and requested this
Authority to close the Complaint.
11.

This Authority has perused the complaint, reply and rejoinder along with the

documents filed thereof and observes that the relief sought by the Complainant is
not maintainable before this Authority. No action can be taken by this Authority
regarding revoking building permission without there being an existence of an
existing building permission from a competent authority placed before this

3 of 4

Authority for consideration. In lieu thereof, nothing remains for adjudication by
this Authority, and the Complaint is disposed of on the said terms.
12.

If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate

Appellate Tribunal (vide G.O.Ms.No.8, Dt.11-01-2018, the Telangana State Value
Added Tax Appellate Tribunal has been designated as TS Real Estate Appellate
Tribunal to manage the affairs under the Act till the regular Tribunal is established)
within 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order.

……………..
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
TS RERA

……………….
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
TS RERA

………….
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
TS RERA

4 of 4