Order Complaint No. 630 Of 2022

BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]

COMPLAINT NO.630 OF 2022

30th Day of March, 2024

Corum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Smt. Praveen Sulthana

…Complainant

Versus

M/s RD Infrastructure & Projects
Represented through its Managing Partner

…Respondent

The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on
26.09.2023, 01.11.2023, 19.12.2023, 06.02.2024, 05.03.2024 and 27.03.2024
before this Authority and none appeared for Complainant and the Respondent and,
this Authority passes the following ORDER:

1

2.

The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31

of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as
the “Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and
Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) requesting
appropriate action against the Respondent Builder.

3.

Notices were issued to the parties as per the address provided by the

Complainant which were returned for hearing on 26.09.2023. Subsequently,
Notices were issued to the parties on 18.10.2023 for hearing on 01.11.2023, which
was returned. Thereafter, another Notice was issued on 20.11.2023 for hearing on
19.12.2023, which was received by the Complainant but returned for the
Respondent

with

the

remark

“insufficient

address”.

On

19.12.2023,

the

Complainant appeared, and this Authority directed him to serve a notice of hearing
upon the Respondent and submit proof of acknowledgment. Accordingly, Notice
was given to the Complainant for service on the Respondent, and matter was
adjourned to 06.02.2024. On 06.02.2024, the Complainant was absent and there
was no representation on behalf of the Respondent either. The matter was
adjourned to 05.03.2024, where both parties were absent again, hence fresh
notices were issued which were returned again.

2

4.

This Authority observes that enough opportunities have been afforded to the

Complainant to appear and submit before this Authority. Given the Complainant's
consistent absence and lack of cooperation with assisting the Authority in serving
notice upon the Respondent, it is apparent that the Complainant does not seek to
pursue the matter. In lieu thereof, the present Complaint stands dismissed for nonprosecution.

5.

If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate

Appellate Tribunal (vide G.O.Ms.No.8, Dt.11-01-2018, the Telangana State Value
Added Tax Appellate Tribunal has been designated as TS Real Estate Appellate
Tribunal to manage the affairs under the Act till the regular Tribunal is established)
within 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA

Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TS RERA

3