Order Complaint No. 495 Of 2023
Order Details
| Order Type | TG-RERA Authority |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | Complaint No. 495 Of 2023 |
| Order Category | Regular Order |
| Order Date | 28 Dec 2023 |
| Complainant | Anish Manavath |
| Respondent | Chella Renuka Reddy |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_291223173319658.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY
AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
COMPLAINT NO.495 OF 2023
28th of December, 2023
Corum:
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Anish Manavath
…Complainant
Versus
M/s Young India Housing Pvt. Ltd rep by Chella Rajendra Reddy and
Chella Renuka Reddy
…Respondent
The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing
on 11.10.2023, 09.11.2023 and on 16.11.2023 before this Authority in the
presence of Complainant present in person, Sri Jagdish and Sri Rajendra
Reddy on behalf of the Respondent and upon hearing the arguments of the
party, this Authority passes the following ORDER:
2.
The present Complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real
Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the
“RE(R&D) Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation
and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) seeking
directions from this Authority to take action against the Respondent.
A. Facts of the case as stated in the complaint filed by the Complainant:
3.
The Complainant asserts that he purchased two plots, numbered 133
and 134, in Green Mango Residencia (herein after referred as GMR projects),
located in Bibinagar Mandal, Yadadri&Bhuvanagiri District, under HMDA
limits in the year 2019. Despite the full payment of the sale consideration, the
Respondent has not registered the plots in the Complainant's name, even
after numerous personal follow-ups and written intimations.
1 of 6
4.
Furthermore, the Complainant discovered that the project land is not
registered in the name of the Respondent, and the project lacks the necessary
approvals. Additionally, the Respondent has collected booking amounts for
the Diamond Ring Residencia (herein after referred as DRR project) without
commencing any developments. Despite the absence of RERA registration or
sanctioned approvals, the Respondent has continued to market and launch
new projects.
B. Relief sought:
5.
Complainant seeks a directive from the Authority to compel the
Respondent to register the plots in the GMR project and to refund the amount
paid for the purchase of the DRR project plot.
C. Reply by the Respondent:
6.
The Respondent contends that M/s Young India Housing Private
Limited is not the developer of the Green Mango Residency project. Instead,
they have purchased the plots from landowners/developers and are selling
them to allottees.
7.
The Respondent asserts that the Complainant, having worked as a
marketing agent within the company, is not an outsider and was well aware of
the company's business operations. Complainant was aware about the fact
that the two projects are not RERA registered and Respondent did not
supressed any facts from the complainant with respect to the concerned
projects.
8.
It is alleged that the Complainant's behaviour and actions are against
the company, and due to differences with the management, he left the
company.
9.
The Respondent claims to have prepared a sale deed on 21.06.2019 and
paid registration charges on 10.07.2019. The Respondent asserts that the
Complainant was not reachable and did not come forward for registration,
choosing instead to approach the RERA authority to create a nuisance.
D. Hearing Conducted:
10.
On
11.10.2023,
a
hearing
was
conducted
in
which
only
the
Complainant was present before the Authority. Consequently, a fresh
2 of 6
summons was issued to the Respondent to appear on the next hearing date,
09.11.2023.
11.
Subsequently, on 09.11.2023, both parties appeared before the
Authority. The Complainant reiterated the contentions raised in the original
complaint, emphasizing the lack of registration of the plots despite full
payment. The Respondent, on the other hand, asserted responsiveness to the
Complainant, providing evidence of paid registration charges. The Bench
questioned the Respondent regarding RERA registration, to which they
admitted the absence in regards to the two concerned real estate projects,
however claiming to operate as Registered Real Estate agents under TS RERA
having registered agent number AO2500000513.
12.
However, the Respondent submitted that they are willing to register the
plot immediately if the complainant still desires the plot to be registered. The
Complainant agreed to this proposition. Consequently, both parties were
granted a week's time to complete the registration of the plot and submit,
before the bench, a copy of the Registered Sale Deed.
13.
Subsequently, on the 16th of November, 2023, the Respondent
submitted the Memorandum of Understanding affidavit. This document
attested to the registration of Plot No. 133 and 134 of the Green Mango
Residencia situated in Bibi Nagar, YadadriBhivangiri District, through a
registered
Sale
Deed
bearing
numbers
2315-8488/2023
and
2315-
8489/2023, dated 10th of November, 2023. Accompanying the MOU affidavit,
copies of the registered Sale Deed were also submitted.
14.
The Authority notes the submission made by the Respondent regarding
the registration of the aforementioned plots, and acknowledges the documents
provided in support of this claim.
E. Observations made by the Authority:
15.
After consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case,
following issues sprout for consideration before this Authority:
1. Whether the Respondent failed to register two plots in the project GMR?
3 of 6
2. Whether the Complaint is entitled to a refund of the amount paid for
the purchase of plot in the DRR project?
3. Whether the Respondent has violated section 10 of RE(R&D) Act of
2016?
Point 1: Whether the Respondent failed to register the plots in the GMR
project?
16.
The Respondent submitted that they are willing to register the plot
immediately if the complainant still desires the plot to be registered. The
Complainant agreed to this proposition. Consequently, both parties were
granted a week's time to complete the registration of the plot and submit,
before the bench, a copy of the Registered Sale Deed. For which on the 16th of
November, 2023, the Respondent submitted the Memorandum of Understanding
affidavit. This document attested to the registration of Plot No. 133 and 134 of the
Green Mango Residencia situated in Bibi Nagar, Yadadri Bhivangiri District, through
a registered Sale Deed bearing numbers 2315-8488/2023 and 2315-8489/2023,
dated 10th of November, 2023. Accompanying the MOU affidavit, copies of the
registered Sale Deed were also submitted. Hence it is deemed that the complainant is
entitled for the registration of the plots. However as an affidavit of memorandum of
understanding was submitted to this Authority, the Authority is of the view that the
said relief is resolved.
Point 2: Whether the Complainant is entitled to a refund of the amount
paid for the purchase of a plot in the DRR project?
17.
The Authority observes that while the Respondent registered plots from
the
GMR
project,
no denial
or
dispute
was
raised
concerning
the
Complainant's purchase in the DRR project by the Respondent. Receipts
submitted by the Complainant as evidence demonstrate payments made for
the DRR project without corresponding registration. The receipts indicate that
the payment was made to the Respondent for the same. This Authority
concludes that the Complainant is entitled to a refund of the entire amount
paid for the DRR project plot as no registration has made till date.
4 of 6
Point 3: Whether the Respondent has violated Section 10 of the RE(R&D)
Act of 2016?
18.
The Respondent admitted during the hearing that the concerned
projects were not RERA registered. The Authority observed that the
Respondent being aware that the concerned projects were not registered
under this Authority, yet sold the plots to the complainant, constituting a
violation of Section 10(a) of the RE(R&D) Act. This section prohibits the sale or
purchase of any plot in a real estate project not registered with the Authority.
Section 10(a) of the RE(R&D) Act of 2016 is reproduced herein below:
10. Every real estate agent registered under section 9 shall
(a) not facilitate the sale or purchase of any plot, apartment or building, as the case
may be, in a real estate project or part of it, being sold by the promoter in any
planning area, which is not registered with the Authority
19.
Plain reading of the above-quoted provision clearly portrays that the
Respondent has violated section the above provision by selling and marketing
of plots of real estate projects which is not registered under the Authority.
Hence, its deemed that the Respondent has violated section 10(a) of the Act.
F. Direction of the Authority:
20.
After consideration of the facts and circumstances, the Authority issues
the following directives:
1. The Respondent is directed to refund the Complainant the amount paid
for the DRR project plot within sixty days from the date of the receipt of
this Order.
i.
The Authority, exercising its power under Section 62 of the RE(R&D)
Act, imposes a penalty of Rs 31,500/- (Rupees thirty-one thousand five
hundred), for contravening Section 10 of the RE(R&D) Act of 2016.
Additionally, the Respondent is directed to strictly comply with the Real
Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, and refrain from
engaging in any marketing or selling activities related to unregistered
projects. The penalty shall be payable in favour of TS RERA FUNDS
through
a
Demand
Draft
or
online
payment
to
A/c
5 of 6
No.50100595798191, HDFC Bank, IFSC Code: HDFC0007036, within a
period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.
21.
In lieu thereof, the present complaint stands disposed of.
22.
If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal (vide G.O.Ms.No.8, Dt.11-01-2018, the Telangana State
Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal has been designated as TS Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal to manage the affairs under the Act till the regular
Tribunal is established) within 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order.
Sd/Sri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TS RERA
Sd/Sri. Laxmi NaryanaJannu,
Hon’ble Member
TS RERA
Sd/-
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TS RERA
6 of 6
Related Orders
Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place