Order Complaint No. 444 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No.444/2025
13th Day of October 2025
Coram:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon'ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon'ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon'ble Member

K. Jyothi Prasad Kosaraju
(Plot No. 854-D, Road No.44, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad)

… Complainant

M/s Jubilee Hills Co-Operative House Building Society Ltd
(Rep. by its President, Sri B Ravindranath, Road No.17-A, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -500171)
…Respondent
The present matters filed by the Complainants herein came up for hearing on 29.08.2025
before this Authority in the presence of the Respondent through its Counsel Sri C.V.R. Rudra
Prasad, and their Associate Advocates, and none appeared on behalf of the Complainant.
Further, this Authority passes the present ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint in the prescribed proforma has been filed by the Complainant

under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter
referred to as the “RE(R&D) Act, 2016”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate
(Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”) against the
Respondent in addition to the earlier complaint filed by him on 28.01.2025 before this
Authority.
3.

On the basis of said earlier petition of 28.01.2025 filed by the complainant Sri K. Jyothi

Prasad, before this Authority, alleging that the Respondent herein was advertising, marketing,
selling and inviting prospective buyers to purchase flats in its project, “Jubilee Hills Phase-IV”,
situated at Manchirevula, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without registering the said
project with TG RERA and as such requested this Authority to take necessary action against
the Respondent as per provisions of the RE(R&D) Act, 2016.
4.

On that this Authority has initiated Suo-motu proceedings against the Respondent, in

exercise of powers conferred under Section 35(1) of the RE(R&D) Act, 2016, by issuing Show
Cause Notice dated 07.02.2025, in response the Respondent has filed counter raising several
Page 1 of 2

---

The subject matter of the above-said Suo-motu case and the present Form-M complaint

filed by the Complainant are one and the same. Further, the reliefs sought for in the present
complaint were already granted in the above-mentioned Suo-motu case, except to the extent of
directing the Respondent to return the money to the public from whom the Respondent had
collected. Since the Complainant is neither an allottee nor an aggrieved person, this Authority
is of the opinion that he has no locus standi to seek such refund of the amount to the public
without the consent of the respective individuals, and hence the same is rejected. No further
relief of imposing of penalty for the same contravention of provisions of the RE(R&D) Act,
2016 pleaded in this complaint required to be imposed against the Respondent, otherwise it will
amount to double jeopardy.
6.

Therefore, the present complaint is closed as infructuous and clubbed with the record

of the disposed of Suo-motu case.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TG RERA

Page 2 of 2

---