Order Complaint No. 34 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No. 34 of 2025
23rd July 2025
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

Md Ifteqaruddin Farooqui
(R/o H.No. 8-13-139/1/p/187,
Kings Colony, Near Shastripuram Road,
Hyderabas 500052)

… Complainant
Versus
M/s. Jayathri Infrastructures Pvt Ltd
(Rep. by Sri. Kakarla Srinivas
Plot No. 140 & 141, Eminent Plaza,
6th Phase, KPHB Colony,Kukatpally,
Hyderabad - 500052)

… Respondent
The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on 10.07.2025
before this Authority, none appeared for Complainant and the Respondent, further this Authority
passes the following ORDER:
2.

This Complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and

Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “RE(R&D) Act” read with Rule 34(1) of
the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as
the “Rules”) seeking directions from this Authority to take action against the Respondent.
3.

The matter was listed for hearing on 06.03.2025, on the said date; none appeared on behalf

of either the Complainant or the Respondent. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned with a
direction to issue fresh notices to all parties. Thereafter, the complaint was listed again on
09.04.2025 and 10.06.2025. On both these dates as well, there was no representation on behalf of
either side. No written submissions or explanations were received by the Authority.
4.

As a matter of due process, the Authority granted a final opportunity and again directed

issuance of fresh notices to both parties.

1

---

The matter was finally posted for hearing on 10.07.2025. On the said date, there was no

representation on behalf of either the Complainant or the Respondents. The records indicate that
the notices issued to both parties were returned with the postal endorsement indicating “insufficient
address,” as filed by the Complainant in the records of this Authority. Efforts were made to reach
the parties through alternate modes of communication; however, no response was received from
either side. In view of continued non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
6.

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Sd/-

Sd/-

Sri. K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon’ble Member

Sri. Laxmi Naryana Jannu,
Hon’ble Member

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson

TG RERA

TG RERA

TG RERA

2

---