Order Complaint No. 209 of 2023

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No. 209/2023
Complaint No.497/2023
Complaint No. 1704/2023
Complaint No. 496/2023
Dated: 23rd February 2026
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

1. Noor-ul-Rahman
(R/o.H.No.10-3-761/F/2
Vijayanagar Colony
Hyderabad, Telangana)

2. Md. Jaffer Ali Khan
(R/o.H.No. 10-5-150
Masab tank, First Lancer,
Opp. Nasheman Hotel,
Hyderabad, Telangana-500028)

3. Smt. Noorunnisa Begum
(R/o.H.No. 10-5-120
Masab tank, First Lancer,
Opp. Nasheman Hotel,
Hyderabad, Telangana-500028)

4. Smt. Mouzamunisa begum
(R/o.H.No. 10-5-120
Masab tank, First Lancer,
Opp. Nasheman Hotel,
Hyderabad, Telangana-500028)

…Complainants
Versus
Raj Kumar Malpani
(Hon. 8-2-608/35 & 36, Plot No. 73,
3rd Floor, Malpani House, Gaffarkhan Colony,
Road No. 10, Banjara Hills,
Hyderabad – 500034, Telangana, India.)

Mr. Vijay Kumar Yerram
(R/o. Plot No. 14 & 15,
Karthik Enclave, Diamond Point,
Sikh village, Secunderabad)

1 of 3

---

…Respondents
The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for final hearing on
20.11.2025 before this Authority; upon pursuing the material on record and on hearing of both
the parties and having stood over for consideration till this day, the following order is passed:
ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31 of the Real

Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “RE(R&D) Act”)
read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017
(hereinafter referred to as the “TG RE(R&D) Rules”) seeking appropriate relief(s) against the
Respondents.
3.

It is the case of the Complainants that they are the absolute owners of certain parcels

of land bearing various municipal numbers situated at Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad. The
Complainants submit that they, along with their family members, had entered into
Development-cum-General Power of Attorney arrangements with the Respondents for
development of a commercial project on the said land.
4.

According to the Complainants, pursuant to the said development arrangement, the

Respondents undertook construction in the project. However, it is alleged that despite
completion of construction, the Respondents failed to properly calculate, demarcate and allot
the share of built-up area belonging to the Complainants in accordance with the terms of the
development agreement and the Deed of Demarcation executed between the parties.
5.

The Complainants have further alleged misrepresentation, non-cooperation and

harassment on the part of the Respondents and have sought various reliefs, including
appropriate action against the Respondents. In certain complaints, the Complainants have also
sought cancellation of the Occupancy Certificate issued in respect of certain blocks of the
project.
6.

The matter was first listed before this Authority on 19.09.2023, on which date both

parties appeared before the Authority.
7.

During the course of proceedings, both parties expressed their willingness to resolve

the dispute amicably. Accordingly, this Authority, in exercise of its powers under Section 32(g)
2 of 3

---

Thereafter, the matter was listed on several occasions for hearing. However, despite

repeated opportunities being granted, the parties failed to diligently prosecute the matter. The
record reflects that on multiple dates of hearing either one or both parties remained absent
without any representation before the Authority.
9.

The matter was adjourned to 06.09.2024, on which date both the Complainants and the

Respondents remained absent. Subsequently, the Complainants were absent on 20.12.2024 and
31.01.2025. On 25.02.2025, the Respondents remained absent. When the matter was taken up
on 26.03.2025, both parties were absent. The matter was again listed on 29.04.2025, when
neither party appeared before the Authority. Thereafter, on 25.06.2025, the Complainants were
absent. On subsequent dates i.e., 21.08.2025, 17.09.2025 and 17.10.2025, both parties
remained absent before this Authority.
10.

The matter was finally posted on 20.11.2025. When the case was called on the said

date, neither the Complainants nor the Respondents appeared before the Authority.
11.

From the above chronology of proceedings, it is evident that despite several

opportunities being granted, the parties have failed to appear and pursue the matter before this
Authority. The consistent non-appearance of the Complainants, in particular, indicates that they
are no longer interested in prosecuting the present complaints.
12.

In such circumstances, this Authority is of the considered view that the present

complaints cannot be kept pending indefinitely in the absence of prosecution by the parties.
13.

Accordingly, the present complaints are liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/Sri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Sri. Laxmi NaryanaJannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA

3 of 3

---