Order Complaint No. 1673 Of 2023
Order Details
| Order Type | TG-RERA Authority |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | Complaint No. 1673 Of 2023 |
| Order Category | Regular Order |
| Order Date | 10 Apr 2024 |
| Complainant | 2. Smt. G. Laxmi |
| Respondent | Sri Gurram Prakash |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_220424152319411.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE TELANGANA STATE REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
COMPLAINT NO.1673 OF 2023
10th Day of April, 2024
Corum:
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
1. Sri G. Ramchander Rao
2. Smt. G. Laxmi
…Complainants
Versus
M/s GRR Realties
Represented by its Managing Director
Sri Gurram Prakash
…Respondent
The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing
on 02.01.2024 and 30.01.2024 before this Authority in the presence of the
Complainant in person and the Respondent remained absent inspite of service
of notice and upon hearing the arguments, this Authority passes the following
ORDER:
2.
The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section
31 of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred
to as the “Act”) read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation
1
and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”)
requesting appropriate action against the Respondent Builder.
A. Brief facts on behalf of the Complainant:
3.
The Complainants submitted that they purchased flat No.202 at
‘Vasistha Block’ from the Respondent Developer in 2016, which was supposed
to be handed over in 2018. They added that despite receiving the entire sale
consideration of Rs.11,50,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only),
excluding taxes, the Respondent Builder has failed to hand over the same
before 2018 as promised. The Complainants filed a copy of the registered sale
deed dated 03.11.2016 bearing document No.11358/2016 which shows that,
the project has DTCP approval vide B.P. No.41/2012/W dated 23.01.2012.
4.
As the Complainants have not received possession of their flat even after
8 (eight) years of making the payment, they sought for refund of the amounts
paid from the Respondent Builder.
B. Observations and directions of the Authority
5.
Notices were issued to both parties for hearing on 02.01.2024. Despite
being in receipt of the Notice, the Respondent failed to appear. The Complainant
No.1 appeared on his behalf and on behalf of Complainant No.2 and reiterated
the contents of the Complaint. As the Respondent failed to appear, notice was
issued again on 02.01.2024 for hearing on 30.01.2024. Despite being in receipt
of the Notice, yet again, the Respondent failed to appear.
2
6.
Meanwhile, to verify the veracity of claims made by the Complainants, an
inspection was conducted on the site situated at Survey No.156/A, of
Velugumatla Revenue Village, under Municipal Corporation limits of Khammam
Urban Mandal, Khammam District. Findings of the Inspection Report dated
03.02.2024 are as follows:
a. The building permission was granted by the Regional Deputy Director,
Town Planning, Warangal vide BP No.41/2012/W, Dt.23.02.2012 in the
name of GRR Srinivasam in gated Community for constructions of
Ccllar+Stilt+ G + 4 Floors in Sy. No. 156/A, Velugumatla village within the
Khammam Municipal Corporation. This building is named as Vasista
Block.
b. The builder has constructed Cellar + Ground + 4 Floors consisting of 40
Flats.
c. The complainant Sri.G.Ramchander has purchased Flat No.202 in 2 nd Floor
during the year 2016 under an agreement to hand over possession by
December 2017. The purchasers / complainants informed that they have
paid total sale consideration amount of Rs.11,50,000/- (Rupees Eleven
Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only).
d. The building is in skeleton stage with only slabs and walls and it is
informed that the construction is made during the year 2016. The cellar
and stilt floors covered with debris and bushes.
e. The total building is in ruined stage having no doors, windows, flooring,
drainage system, electricity, water supply and others internal and external
facilities.
3
f. It appears that the builder / promoter has deceived not only the present
complainants but also other 38 flats purchasers.
7.
A clear interpretation of Section 3 makes it clear that projects for which
Occupancy Certificate is not obtained as on date of commencement of this Act,
have to mandatorily obtain registration before this Authority. In the absence of
such registration by the Respondent Builder and on account of no development
of the Project as per inspection report, it is clear that the Respondent Builder
has violated provisions of Sections 3 and 4 and more specifically Section
11(4)(b) which mandates obtaining of Occupancy Certificate from concerned
competent authorities. This act on part of the Respondent is deprecated and
therefore, this Authority, while exercising its powers under Section 60, imposed
a penalty of Rs.5,94,594/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Ninety-Four Thousand Five
Hundred and Ninety-Four Only) on the Respondent vide Order dated
10.04.2024 in a similar connected matter bearing Complaint No.1592/2023
titled “Sri Y. Eswar Rao vs. M/s GRR Realties”.
8.
As far as the Complainant’s relief is concerned, as per the Inspection
Report, it is clear that the Respondent has failed in its obligation to handover
the Flat within time stipulated in accordance with the Sale Deed dated
03.11.2016 bearing document No.11358/2016 and therefore, the Complainant
is entitled for complete refund of amount paid along with interest as per Rules.
Therefore, the Respondent is hereby directed to cancel the registration of the
flat No.202 at ‘Vasistha Block’ and refund an amount of Rs.11,50,000/(Rupees Eleven Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) along with such other additional
amounts paid by the Complainant for registration of the Sale Deed dated
03.11.2016 bearing document No.11358/2016 with interest at the rate of 10.65
4
% (8.65 + 2) as per Rules, 2017 from the date of the Sale Deed i.e., from
03.11.2016 till the date of payment made to the Complainant, within 30 days
from the date of the receipt of this Order, failing which appropriate action under
Section 63 will be initiated against the Respondent.
9.
The complaint is accordingly disposed of.
10.
If aggrieved by this Order, the parties may approach the TS Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal (vide G.O.Ms.No.8, Dt.11-01-2018, the Telangana State
Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal has been designated as TS Real Estate
Appellate Tribunal to manage the affairs under the Act till the regular Tribunal
is established) in accordance with Section 44 of the Act, 2016.
Sd/……………………………
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA
Sd/……………………………………
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon'ble Member,
TS RERA
Sd/………………………………………
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon'ble Chairperson,
TS RERA
5
Related Orders
Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place