Order Complaint No. 127 of 2024

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Complaint No. 127 of 2024
Dated: 03rd December 2024
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member

L Balaraju
(R/o A407, Kollur, beside Birla open Mind International School, RC Purum, Sangareddy - 502300))
…Complainant

Versus
M/s Svadha Kolluru Projects
(Rep byMs.A Kusuma Kumari, Plot no.61, Shilpa Hills, Kondapur - 500084)

…Respondent

The present matter filed by the Complainant herein came up for hearing on
03.12.2024 before this Authority wherein Complainant present in person and Sri V Surendra
for the Respondent, and after hearing upon the parties, this Authority passes the following
ORDER:
2.

The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31 of the

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"),
read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules,
2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"), seeking directions against the Respondent for
alleged deficiencies in the project "SvadhaKollur".
3.

The Complainant submitted that various issues existed in the project, including:
a.

Absence of a canopy above the designated car parking space (A23),

b.

Improper finishing of tile joints in the flat despite prior complaints,

c.

Alleged discrepancy in the area measurement of Flat A407,

d.

Absence of recreational facilities such as resting chairs near the clubhouse pool,

e.

Non-installation of a cricket practice net as shown in promotional materials,

f.

Dust accumulation in the cellar due to improper venting,

1 of 2

g.

4.

General deviation from the promises made in brochures and promotional videos
affecting approximately 190 flat buyers.
The Complainant also requested the Authority to take note of these issues and to

prevent the Respondent from launching another project titled "Svadha Mackenna" (Telangana
RERA Reg. No. P01100005647).
5.

In response, the Respondent’s representative submitted that the complaint was

wrongly addressed to M/s SvadhaKolluru Projects, and the Managing Director, Ms. A.
Kusuma Kumari, is not an addressee at the address to which the notice was issued. It was
further contended that there exists no contractual relationship between the Complainant and
the said company as the alleged grievances are not against the company itself.
7.

During the course of the hearing, the Complainant agreed to the Respondent’s

submission and admitted that he was unaware of the correct address and appropriate party to
be impleaded. The Complainant voluntarily submitted that he wishes to withdraw the
complaint with liberty to file a fresh complaint against the correct party with the appropriate
address.
8.

This Authority is of the considered opinion that no adjudication on merits is

warranted in the present matter at this stage, as the Complainant has sought permission to
withdraw the complaint due to procedural deficiencies.
9.

Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed with liberty to the Complainant to

file a fresh complaint by impleading the appropriate party.

Sd/Sri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Sri. Laxmi NaryanaJannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA

2 of 2