Interim Order Complaint No.427 of 2025.
Order Details
| Order Type | TG-RERA Authority |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | Complaint No.427 of 2025 |
| Year | 2025 |
| Order Category | Interim Order |
| Order Date | 18 Feb 2026 |
| Complainant | Madhu Murhty S |
| Respondent | M/s Pranith Koncpets and Developers LLP |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_250326223719116.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Date: 18th February, 2026
Quorum:
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
COMPLAINT NO. 425/2025/TGRERA
COMPLAINT NO. 426/2025/TGRERA
COMPLAINT NO. 427/2025/TGRERA
COMPLAINT NO. 428/2025/TGRERA
Shankar Sirisha R & Anr
Shaik Ambani
Mr.N Balaji
Madhu Murhty S
…Complainant
Versus
M/s Pranith Koncepts Private Ltd rep by its Director, Sri P N Suresh
Pranith Koncepts Ambience
M/s Pranith Koncpets and Developers LLP
…Respondents
INTERIM ORDER
The present Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under Section 31 of the Real
Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “RE(R&D) Act”)
read with Rule 34(1) of the Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017
(hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”).
2.
These complaints pertain to the same project “Pranith Koncepts Ambience” registered
with this Authority vide Registration No. P02400006122.
3.
Since identical issues arise in all the above complaints, involving common questions of
fact and law and the same Respondent, this Authority deems it appropriate to dispose of the
present stage of proceedings by way of this Common Interim Order.
A. Brief facts of the case as per Form M submitted by the Complainant.
4.
The Complainants in the above matters are allottees of flats in the project “Pranith
Koncepts Ambience”. Agreements of Sale were executed between the years 2022–2023 and the
1 of 4
It is the consistent grievance of the Complainants that though the project is registered
only in respect of Blocks A, C and D, the construction has not progressed beyond structural stage
and repeated assurances given by the Respondent regarding delivery by December 2024 have not
been fulfilled.
6,
It is further alleged that the Respondent has undertaken marketing, selling and offering
for sale in respect of Blocks B, E, F and G, and additional floors, which are not covered under
Registration No. P02400006122.
7.
It is also brought on record that a Show Cause Notice has been issued for unauthorized
construction, execution of Agreements of Sale prior to registration and sale of unregistered
blocks.
8.
The Registration Certificate bearing No. P02400006122 clearly reflects that registration
is granted only in respect of Blocks A, C and D of the project.
9.
Section 3(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 mandates in
unequivocal terms that:
“No promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase
in any manner any plot, apartment or building, as the case may be, in any real estate project
or part of it, in any planning area, without registering the real estate project with the Real
Estate Regulatory Authority established under this Act.”
10.
The language employed by the Legislature is prohibitory and absolute in nature. The
expression “no promoter shall” clearly denotes a statutory embargo, and the prohibition extends
not merely to sale but even to advertisement, marketing, booking or invitation to purchase.
11.
In the present case, the Registration Certificate bearing No. P02400006122 covers only
Blocks A, C and D. Therefore, any act of advertising, marketing, booking, selling, offering for
sale or inviting persons to purchase in respect of Blocks B, E, F and G, which are not covered
under the said registration, would prima facie fall within the mischief of Section 3(1) of the
RE(R&D) Act.
12.
Such violation, if established, attracts penal consequences under Section 59 of the
RE(R&D) Act, which provides for imposition of penalty for contravention of Section 3, including
2 of 4
Accordingly, this Authority is satisfied that a prima facie case exists for examining
contravention of Section 3(1) read with Section 59 of the RE(R&D) Act in respect of the
unregistered blocks.
14.
At this stage, upon consideration of the material placed before it, this Authority records
the following prima facie findings:
a) The project stands registered only for Blocks A, C and D.
b) There are serious allegations of marketing and selling in respect of unregistered Blocks
B, E, F and G.
c) There is delay in progress of construction even in the registered blocks.
d) The Respondent has not facilitated formation of Association of Allottees, as mandated
under Section 11(4)(e) of the Act.
15.
The object of the RE(R&D) Act is to ensure transparency, financial discipline and
protection of homebuyers. Any continued marketing of unregistered portions of the project would
defeat the very purpose of the RE(R&D) Act.
16.
In view of the seriousness of the allegations and in order to prevent further statutory
violations, this Authority finds it necessary to exercise its powers under Section 36 of the
RE(R&D) Act.
17.
Accordingly, pending final adjudication of the complaints, this Authority hereby directs
as follows:
A. The Respondent, M/s. Pranith Koncepts Pvt. Ltd., its Directors, employees, agents, marketing
agencies or any person acting on its behalf, are hereby restrained from marketing, advertising,
selling, offering for sale, booking or Inviting persons to purchase or collecting any amount in
respect of Blocks B, E, F and G, or any additional floors not covered under Registration No.
P02400006122, until separate registration is obtained under the RE(R&D) Act.
B. TG RERA Secretary is directed to initiate steps for imposition of penalty under Section 59
and other applicable provisions of the RE(R&D) Act for alleged violation of Section 3 and 4
in respect of unregistered blocks.
C. The Respondent shall file within two (2) weeks:
i.
Updated stage-wise construction report of Blocks A, C and D,
3 of 4
Financial utilization statement as mandated under Section 4(2)(l)(D),
iii.
Revised timeline for completion, duly supported by an affidavit.
D. The material placed before this Authority prima facie indicates that the Respondent–Promoter
has failed to take effective steps for enabling the formation of the Association of Allottees, as
mandated under Section 11(4)(e) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016,
which casts a statutory obligation upon the promoter to enable the formation of an
association, society or cooperative society of the allottees within the prescribed time. In view
thereof, and in order to safeguard the collective interests of the allottees, the Allottees are
hereby permitted and directed to initiate steps for formation of the Association of Allottees in
accordance with the applicable laws. The Respondent Promoter shall extend full cooperation
and shall furnish all necessary documents, including the list of allottees and relevant project
details, without obstruction or delay.
18.
This interim order shall operate until further orders or until registration of the project with
this Authority
Sd/Sri. K. Srinivas Rao,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA
Sd/Sri. Laxmi NaryanaJannu,
Hon’ble Member
TG RERA
Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson
TG RERA
4 of 4
Related Orders
Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place