Interim Order Complaint No.132 of 2026
Order Details
| Order Type | TG-RERA Authority |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | Complaint No.132 of 2026 |
| Year | 2026 |
| Order Category | Interim Order |
| Order Date | 07 Apr 2026 |
| Complainant | 2.Muttha Mohana Lakshmi |
| Respondent | 3. D Anupama Priyadarshini (Public relationship Manager) |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_100426154408865.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Dated: 7th April, 2026
Quorum:
Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
Complaint No. 130 of 2026
1.Gedela Ravikumar
2.Muttha Mohana Lakshmi
… Complainants
Versus
1. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Authorised signatory, Panchangam Nivarthi Suresh
2. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Company Director, Panchangam Nivarthi Pranith
3. D Anupama Priyadarshini (Public relationship Manager)
… Respondents
Complaint No. 131 of 2026
Kuteddula Vijaya
… Complainant
Versus
1. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Authorised signatory, Panchangam Nivarthi Suresh
2. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Company Director, Panchangam Nivarthi Pranith
3. D Anupama Priyadarshini (Public relationship Manager)
… Respondents
Complaint No. 132 of 2026
GV Venkata Vara Prasad
… Complainant
Versus
1. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Authorised signatory, Panchangam Nivarthi Suresh
2. Pranith Koncepts Private Limited
Rep. by its Company Director, Panchangam Nivarthi Pranith
3. D Anupama Priyadarshini (Public relationship Manager)
… Respondents
The present set of Complaints have been filed under Section 31 of the Real Estate
(Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “RE(R&D) Act”) read
Page 1 of 4
The present set of Complaints have been filed by the Complainant under Section
31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the
Act”), read with the applicable Rules, complaining of the failure and deficiency on the part of
the Respondent, namely Pranith Koncepts Private Limited, in completing the construction,
executing registration, and handing over possession of Flat Nos. C203, D201 and D203, in the
project “PRANITH KONCEPTS AMBIANCE”, despite having received the sale consideration
from the Complainants as per the Agreements of Sale. Since the Complaints herein arise from
a similar cause of action, seek identical relief against the same respondents, and involve
common questions of fact and law, they are hereby clubbed together for the purpose of
convenience and efficient adjudication.
Accordingly, the following COMMON ORDER is passed.
3.
The Complainants and Respondents in CC. No. 131/2026 entered into an Agreement of
Sale dated 30.07.2022, wherein the Complainant was allotted Flat No. C203, in Block-C of the
project “Pranith Koncepts Ambiance” located at Survey No. 181/Part, Puppalguda Village,
Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, and the Complainant has paid the total
sale consideration of Rs. 32,38,500/-. The Complainant submitted that, however, it later came
to light that the flat allotted to the Complainant is a mortgaged property and that till date, the
Occupancy Certificate has not been obtained. That the flat has neither been cleared of the
mortgage nor registered in the Complainant’s name.
4.
The Complainants and Respondents in CC. No. 130/2026 entered into an Agreement of
Sale dated 19.07.2022, wherein the Complainant was allotted Flat No. D201, in Block-D of the
project “Pranith Koncepts Ambiance,” located at Survey No. 181/Part, Puppalguda Village,
Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, and the Complainant has paid the total
sale consideration of Rs. 37,00,000/-. The Complainant submitted that however, the flat allotted
to the Complainant was found to be a mortgaged property. and that till date, the Occupancy
Certificate has not been obtained. That the flat has neither been cleared of the mortgage nor
registered in the Complainant’s name.
5.
The Complainants and Respondents in CC. No. 132/2026 entered into an Agreement of
Sale dated 110.04.2023, wherein the Complainant was allotted Flat No. D203, in Block-D of
the project “Pranith Koncepts Ambiance,” located at Survey No. 181/Part, Puppalguda Village,
Page 2 of 4
It is the specific case of the Complainants herein is that despite payment of entire sale
consideration and repeated requests, the Respondents have neither completed the construction
of the subject flats nor proceeded with its registrations.
7.
Pending final disposal of the Complaint, the Complainant has sought the following
interim relief:
i.
To direct the Respondents to restrain from selling, marketing, booking, allotting,
transferring, or creating any rights or interests in favour of any new purchaser or third
party in respect of Flat No. C203 in CC. No. 131/2026, Flat No. D201 in CC. No.
130/2026 and Flat No. D203 in CC. No. 132/2026, while continuing construction,
statutory compliances, mortgage clearance and efforts to obtain occupancy certificate
without interruption.
8.
The present matter was taken up for hearing before this Authority on 07.04.2026,
wherein the Complainants were present and submitted that they have apprehension about thirdparty alienation with respect to the subject flats. Having heard the same, this Authority is of the
view that with the Respondent’s obligations still outstanding, the Complainants’ rights over the
said flats remain unsecured, rendering their apprehension about potential third-party alienation
justifiable, making it appropriate to grant interim protection and accordingly directed that no
third-party interest shall be created in respect of the subject flats.
9.
Therefore, upon examining the material available on record, and having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case, and in exercise of the powers vested in this Authority under
Section 36 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, this Authority is of the
considered view that a prima facie case is made out for grant of interim protection. Accordingly,
the following interim direction is hereby issued:
“The Respondent is hereby restrained from alienating, registering, encumbering, or
creating any third-party interest whatsoever in respect of Flat Nos. C203 in block ‘C’,
D201 and D203 in block ‘D’ within the "Pranith Koncepts Ambiance" project as
Page 3 of 4
The matters are posted for further hearing on 28.04.2026.
Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon’ble Member,
TG RERA
Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon’ble Member,
TG RERA
Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson,
TG RERA
Page 4 of 4
Related Orders
Interim Order Complaint No.228 of 2025
Rangareddy, Telangana, 500077)Order Complaint No. 386 of 2025
Koti, Hyderabad-500027.Order Complaint No. 153 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 152 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Order Complaint No. 151 of 2024
Telangana – 500011.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place