Interim Order Complaint no. 401 of 2025

BEFORE TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
[Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016]
Date: 11th December, 2025
Quorum:

Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.), Hon’ble Chairperson
Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Hon’ble Member
Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu, Hon’ble Member
Complaint No. 236 of 2025

1. CH. Satyavathi
2. Ch. Ramalakshmi
3. CH. Srinivas,
4. CH. Seethalakshmi,
5. K. Mallika
R/o: Flat No.306, Shrigdha NVR Arcade, Street No. 12, Gokul Nagar, near Vijaya Milk Dairy,
Tarnaka, Secunderabad – 500007.
…Complainants
Versus
1. Vasavi Nirmaan Private Limited,
Represented by its Director, Mr. Vijay Kumar Yerram
O/o: House No/ Plot No: 82269/ S/59, Building Name: Sagar Society, Road no: 2, Banjara
Hills, Near Alahabad Bank, Telangana, Hyderabad - 500034.
2. MPM Ventures Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad,
Represented by its Managing Director, Sri. Girish Malpani
O/o: Plot no 44, 5th Floor, Jayabheri Pine Vally Colony, Gachibowli. Hyderabad 500032.
3. Vasavi MPM Grand Flat Unit Owners Maintenance Mutually Aided Cooperative
Society Limited,
Represented by its President, Santosh Rao Balguri
O/o: Unit no 1309, 12th floor, Vasavi MPM Grand Building, Yellareddyguda road, Ameerpet,
Hyderabad - 500073
…Respondents
Complaint No. 288 of 2025
1. Satyanarayana Prasad Papolu
2. Rama Devi Papolu
O/o: Unit No. 503, 4th Floor, Vasavi MPM Grand, Yellareddyguda, Ameerpet, Hyderabad –
500073.
…Complainants
Versus
Page 1 of 7

---

---

Page 3 of 7

---

---

This batch of matters is taken up together as the parties, project, issues, and allegations

are substantially interlinked and arise out of the same project known as “Vasavis MPM Grand/
MPM Grand”, comprising Block-A and Block-B, situated at Yellareddyguda, Ameerpet,
Hyderabad. The project is covered by GHMC building permissions and is registered under the
Telangana RERA through Registration Nos. P02500002240 and P02500000769. Across all
complaints, it is commonly alleged that the Respondents have undertaken construction in
deviation of the sanctioned GHMC plans, including non-provision of internal corridors on
several floors, demolition, alteration or conversion of areas designated as common washrooms,
modification of approved entrances and exits, erection of unauthorized ramps and mezzanine
structures, blocking and altering common access routes, putting up unauthorized commercial
boards in common areas, and carrying out various alterations that affect fire-safety, setbacks,
and approved circulation spaces.
3.

Multiple complainants allege that common washrooms, particularly those sanctioned

on the north-west side of floors 1 to 4, have not been constructed as per plan, that washrooms
on certain floors were demolished or converted into saleable commercial spaces, that access to
toilets was locked, and that internal circulation spaces and common entrances meant to enable
free movement within the commercial floors were not provided. Several complainants assert
that despite obtaining Occupancy Certificate, substantial works remain incomplete and
essential amenities such as electricity, required power-backup, water and sewerage
connections, internal utilities, flooring, ceiling work, shutters, and lift maintenance have not
been provided, rendering units commercially unusable. It is further alleged that the
Respondents have encroached into common areas by converting cellar parking spaces into
commercial office spaces, selling or attempting to sell areas meant for common utilities,
allowing installation of AC units and other equipment in common corridors, altering areas
earmarked for hypermarket use, and modifying the structural layout in violation of approved
plans. Parking-related grievances also arise repeatedly, including allegations that the
Respondents permitted unauthorized parking in setback areas, failed to hand over designated
Page 5 of 7

---

It is observed that, despite multiple opportunities granted to the Respondents to file

their counter/replies in the above-mentioned cases, the Respondents have consistently failed to
do so and have repeatedly sought adjournments. The allottees cannot be put to prolonged
suffering on account of the conduct of the Respondents. Prima facie, the Complainants have
made out a strong case, and the balance of convenience lies in their favour. At this stage,
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matters and solely with a view to safeguard
the rights of the allottees and prevent any irreversible changes pending adjudication, the
Authority considers it appropriate to issue interim directions. Therefore, upon examining the
material available on record, due consideration of the facts, and in the exercise of the powers
vested in this Authority under Section 36 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act,
2016, the following interim directions are hereby issued:
a) The Respondents shall not undertake or permit any unauthorized construction,
modification, alteration, demolition, or conversion in the project, including in any
portion of the common areas, facilities or amenities, contrary to the sanctioned plan
approved by the Competent Authority.
b) The Respondents shall maintain and provide all common washrooms and toilet
facilities strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan approved by the competent
authority, and shall ensure that such facilities remain fully accessible and operational at
all times.
c) The areas designated for common washrooms in the sanctioned plan shall not be
alienated, altered, encroached upon, demolished, converted, or repurposed for any other
use. Unrestricted access to the common washrooms on all floors shall be provided to
all allottees, including workers, tenants and visitors, and no obstruction, locking,
blocking, or denial of access shall be permitted under any circumstances.
d) In the event the Occupancy Certificate (OC) has been obtained for either of the Blocks,
the Respondents shall forthwith facilitate and ensure the completion of the process for
Page 6 of 7

---

These interim directions shall remain in force and shall continue to operate until further

orders of this Authority.
6.

The Respondent is directed to file its counter-affidavit by the next date of hearing,

failing which the matter shall proceed ex parte.
7.

The matter is posted for further hearing on 23.01.2026.

Sd/Sri K. Srinivasa Rao,
Hon’ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Sri Laxmi Narayana Jannu,
Hon’ble Member,
TG RERA

Sd/Dr. N. Satyanarayana, IAS (Retd.),
Hon’ble Chairperson,
TG RERA

Page 7 of 7

---