Order in IA No.16 of 2024 in CCP No.5 of 2024
Order Details
| Order Type | Adjudicating Officer |
|---|---|
| Complaint/Case Number | CCP No.5 of 2024 |
| Year | 2024 |
| Order Date | 08 Oct 2024 |
| Respondent | its Partner Mr.Soham Modi. |
| PDF Document | Download PDF BU_191024131934177.pdf |
Full Order Text
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
HYDERABAD.
Dated, this, the 8th day of OCTOBER, 2024.
Present:- Sri Syed Lateef-ur Rahman,
Adjudicating Officer.
I.A.No.16 of 2024
in
COMPLAINT No.05/2024/TG RERA
Between:
Smt.Chiruvolu Naga Brunda.
and
…Petitioner/Complainant.
M/s. Modi Realty Genome Valley LLP, rep., by
its Partner Mr.Soham Modi.
…Respondent/Respondent.
This Interlocutory Application came up for hearing before me on 04.10.2024 in the
presence of Sri P.Rama Krishna, Counsel for the petitioner/complainant and of Sri M.A.Lateef,
Counsel for the respondent/respondent, upon perusing the material on record and upon
hearing the arguments of both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, the
following order is passed:
ORDER
This is a petition under Order VI, Rule 17 read with Sec.151 CPC filed by
petitioner/complainant to permit her to amend the complaint as under:
“4.1(a). The Flat No.117 on the First floor, in Block No.A 800 Sft., undivided
share of land of 44.10 Sq.Yards, single car parking (105 Sft) and more clearly
mentioned in the Annexure-A of Agreement of Sale dated 04.08.2021.
I submit that amend Para No.4.19 compensation amount delete ‘Rs.75,000/-’
and add Rs.1,75,000/- and following pleading may be added to complaint as
Para No.4.19(a) after the para No.4.19 of the complaint:
4.19(a) I submit that the complaint booked the flat for pollution free
environment and peaceful living in the outskirt, but it become in vain due to the
delay in the delivery of possession by the Respondent and it became nightmare
various dates to 15.06.2024 for delivery possession of the flat. But
there is no response from the Respondent . Due to the harassment and mental
agony caused by the respondent, husband of complainant fell sick and had to
take treatment.
To grant minimum compensation of Rs.1,75,000/- for
harassment, mental agony and suffering and the legal expenses of Rs.25,000/-.
6. In para No.5 of the complaint, complainant may be permitted to amend the
compensation sought deleting the words ‘Rs.1,02,400/- + Rs.75,000/-’ and add
as under:The complainant prays the compensation relief as follows:
(a) To compensate loss of rent Rs.1,02,400/(b) To grant minimum compensation of Rs.1,75,000/- for harassment, mental
agony and suffering as per Sec.18(3) of the Act.
(c) To grant legal expenses of Rs.25,000/(d) And to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Authority deems fit
and proper in the interest of justice and equity”
2.
The petitioner/complainant has filed her affidavit in support of the petition narrating
the circumstances which compelled her to file present petition. According to her, she had no
legal knowledge and now she has engaged an Advocate to represent her. She stated that at the
time of filing complaint, she could not furnish crucial information and documents and as such,
the amendment now sought is essential:
3.
Respondent filed a counter contending that the petitioner/complainant suppressed
material particulars while filing complaint. As such, she cannot be permitted now to amend the
pleading.
4.
Now the Point for consideration is:
Whether the petition has merits and deserves to be allowed or not?
POINT:
Admittedly, the petitioner/complainant filed present complaint in person.
The
explanation offered by the petitioner/complainant to move present petition appears to be
acceptable. No prejudice would be caused to respondent/respondent if the petition is allowed,
inasmuch as they will have right to file additional counter replying to the amendment now
sought and then contest the case. Since the matter is pending disposal, it is not just and
appropriate at this stage to go into the details of the case, inasmuch as if anything observed on
merits of the case, it may cause prejudice to the contentions of the parties in the main case.
Therefore, the petition has merits and deserves to be allowed.
7.
In the result, this petition is allowed. No cost.
Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this, the 8th day of
OCTOBER, 2024.
ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TG RERA: HYDERABAD.
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TG RERA: HYDERABAD.
C.
Related Orders
CCP No.04 of 2024 dt.24.03.2025 Ex parte CC
Mangalhat, Amamnagar, Hyderabad 500 006.CCP No.41 of 2024 Dt.18.03.2025 withdraw CC
Post, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.CCP No.42 of 2024 Dt.13.03.2025 withdrawn CC
Post, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.Need Complete Property Verification?
Get ownership details, EC records, survey sketch, zone checks, geo-insights & AI analysis - all in one place