CCP No.34 of 2024 Dt.12.03.2025 withdrawn

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TELANGANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
HYDERABAD.
Dated, this the 12th day of MARCH, 2025.
Present:- Sri Syed Lateef-ur Rahman,
Adjudicating Officer.
C.C.P.No.34/2024/TG RERA
Between:

Ms.Naga Lakshmi Busireddy D/o B.Narayana Reddy,
R/o D104, Flat 301, Saya Splendor, Madhura
Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad.
…Complainant.
And
M/s.Ramky Sri Sairam Properties Pvt.Ltd., rep.,
by its Authorized Signatory Sri K.Anil Babu, 9th Floor,
Ramky Grandiose, Ramky Towers, Gachibowli, Hyderabad –
500032.
…Respondent.
This complaint came up before me on this day for enquiry and the
complainant and the respondent remained absent and after perusing the
memo filed in office by the complainant and having stood over for
consideration, the following order is passed:

ORDER
The present complaint has been filed under Section 31 of the Real
Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred as “the
Act”) read with Rule 35 of the Telangana State Real Estate (Regulation and
Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred as “the Rules”) to grant
compensation.
2(a). The case of the complainant, in nutshell, is that one Donepudi
Surendra Babu and (13) others are absolute owners and possessors of land
admeasuring Ac.10-17 ½ Gts of land situated at Sy.No.159/part of
Bachupally village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,

having
Page 1 of 3

---

The Landlords, by virtue of Development

Agreement, granted exclusive rights of development of the said land by way
of construction of Residential Apartments by the developer on the terms and
conditions agreed under the said Development Agreement.
2(b). It is further averred in the complaint that the complainant booked a
residential Apartment bearing Flat No.603 in Tower-7 under the agreement
of sale on 17.02.2023 executed by the respondent. Prior to agreement of
sale, the complainant paid Rs.7,86,488/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs, Eighty Six
Thousand, Four Hundred and Eighty Eight only) towards advance and after
agreement of sale, they paid remaining sale consideration of Rs.55,05,414/(Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs, Five Thousand, Four Hundred and Fourteen only).
The complainant has paid thus total amount of Rs.62,91,902/- (Rs. Sixty
Two Lakhs, Ninety One Thousand, Nine Hundred and Two only.) At the time
of booking of Flat, the Promoter’s salesperson assured that the Project would
be completed by December, 2023 and will deliver possession before
February, 2024. During their visit at the site in May, 2024, the complainant
observed that possession will not be possible before 30th June, 2024 as per
the Agreement terms.

When they approached the Head Relationship

Page 2 of 3

---

On registration of the complaint, notices were issued to both the

parties. Upon receipt of notice, respondent made appearance through Sri
K.V.Rusheek Reddy, Advocate, who filed Vakalat on behalf of respondent
and later filed counter. When the matter was coming up for enquiry and
hearing, it is represented that the matter is likely to be settled. Later, the
complainant filed a memo in office stating inter alia that the parties have
entered into an amicable settlement and, therefore, prays to permit to
withdraw the complaint.
4.

Perused memo.

In view of settlement of dispute as mentioned in

memo, the memo deserves to be allowed permitting the complainant to
withdraw case.
5.

In the result, the memo is allowed and the complaint is disposed off as

“withdrawn”. No costs.
Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court
on this, the 12th day of MARCH, 2025.
ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TG RERA: HYDERABAD.
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL

Cc.

ADJUDICATING OFFICER,
TG RERA: HYDERABAD.

Page 3 of 3

---